decrease font size
increase font size
change type face
bookmark this page
email this page
print this page

ThePoultrySite Latest News

Search ThePoultrySite:
Section:

Use the above box to search this section or the whole site
Friday, November 02, 2007
Print This Page

Selling Of 'Enhanced' Poultry Has Congress Crying Foul

US - Poultry producers, Congress members and regulators are tussling over the classic Shakespearean question: "What's in a name?"

100 percent natural chicken

Or to mangle Juliet's phrase, "That which we call 100 percent natural chicken - injected with up to 15 percent brine, broth and flavor - would taste as sweet."

While such "enhanced" poultry may be labeled as natural under current U.S. Department of Agriculture rules, a number of producers and politicians are crying foul. The agency held a public hearing on the issue in December; accepted reams of ensuring comments as well as petitions and letters from the industry and politicians; and still continues to weigh all the arguments.

The latest missive came in the form of a letter, signed last month by 40 legislators including California's Democratic senators Dianne Feinstein and Barbara Boxer and Rep. Dennis Cardoza, D-Merced.

"When 40 members of Congress from nine states send a letter to the department of agriculture, they've got to pay attention," said Charles Hansen, a lobbyist working on behalf of the Truthful Labeling Coalition as well as the California Poultry Federation, who argue brine-injected chickens are anything but natural.

Jamie McInerney, Cardoza's press officer, said the USDA policy poses "an egregious problem in their labeling standards.

To continue reading this article please click here

Source: Recordnet.com

Our Newest
Web Site


TheBioenergySite

Friday 29th August

Search Site
On-Line Book Shop