EPA halts stricter water rules for meat plants
Cost, closures and rural impact cited in agency decisionThe Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) last week said more restrictive federal wastewater regulations would impose unjustified costs and facility closures on US meat and poultry processors—especially in rural areas—and decided not to move forward with proposed new rules, according to a recent press release from the National Chicken Council.
The decision, issued Aug. 30, found that existing federal, state and local Clean Water Act regulations are working effectively. The EPA concluded that the current national effluent standards are sufficient to protect water quality.
“EPA, under the Biden administration, did not provide adequate time to allow for meaningful public comment on the proposed rule which, if it was finalized, would have resulted in numerous facility closures, major job losses nationwide, and higher production costs,” said Ashley Peterson, senior vice-president of scientific and regulatory affairs with the National Chicken Council. “We're grateful that the agency is taking no further action on the ELG rule and remain committed to doing our part to keep our nation’s water supply safe.”
The meat and poultry sector is already regulated under 2004 effluent limitations guidelines (ELGs) and must meet discharge limits under existing federal and state-level permits.
Comprehensive review projected billions in costs
The EPA has been conducting a multi-year review to assess whether tougher federal standards were warranted. The agency examined multiple regulatory scenarios that, according to industry analysis, would have cost processors up to US$20 billion and caused 74 to 340 plant closures. Estimated job losses ranged from 31,000 to 93,000.
Eight industry associations—including the National Pork Producers Council, US Poultry & Egg Association, North American Renderers Association and the American Farm Bureau Federation—opposed the proposed changes, warning of disruption across the food chain.
Local wastewater authorities backed current system
The National Association of Clean Water Agencies (NACWA), which represents local publicly owned treatment works, also supported maintaining current rules.
In comments submitted last year, NACWA said local pretreatment programs “have reached a state of maturity that allows them to understand their own treatment operations and effectively regulate industrial users … especially in the case of conventional pollutants that POTWs are designed to treat.”
No further regulatory changes are expected.