Australian Egg Company Fined for Misleading Claims

AUSTRALIA - The Federal Court has ordered an A$300,000 penalty after finding 'free range' egg claims to be misleading.
calendar icon 20 October 2014
clock icon 4 minute read

Last month, the Federal Court has declared by consent that Pirovic Enterprises Pty Ltd (Pirovic) engaged in misleading conduct and made misleading representations in its labelling and promotion of eggs as ‘free range’, in proceedings brought by the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC).

The Court ordered that Pirovic pay a pecuniary penalty of A$300,000 and contribute to the ACCC’s costs.

From January 2012 until January 2014, Pirovic used egg cartons which included the words ‘Free Range’ and images of hens on open pasture.

The Court found that by labelling and promoting the eggs as ‘free range’, Pirovic represented to consumers that the eggs were produced by hens which were able to move about freely on an open range each day, and that most of the hens did in fact do so on most days. In fact, as Pirovic admitted, most of its hens did not move about freely on an open range on most days.

ACCC Chairman Rod Sims said: “Credence claims such as free range claims are powerful tools for businesses to distinguish their products. However, if they are false or misleading, they serve to mislead consumers, who may pay a premium to purchase such products.”

The Court found that the eggs supplied by Pirovic were produced by hens, most of which did not move about on an open range because of a combination of the following factors:

  • the stocking densities inside the barns where the hens were housed
  • the flock sizes inside those barns and
  • the number, size and placement and operation of the physical openings to the open range.

Mr Sims added: “This decision provides very clear guidance that any free range egg claim must be backed by farming conditions and practices implemented by suppliers under which hens actually move about on an open range each day.”

The ACCC and Pirovic had agreed on joint submissions and proposed orders to be put to the Court for consideration.

This case forms part of an investigation by the ACCC into free range claims made by a number of egg producers across Australia. This investigation was initiated by the ACCC in response to community concerns.

There are a number of farming conditions that impact on whether hens are able to, and do, move freely on an open range each day. The conditions (and their impact) vary between producers and no single condition of itself is conclusive. The relevant conditions include:

  • the internal stocking density of sheds
  • the conditions of the internal areas the hens are housed in
  • the number, size and location of any openings to an outdoor area
  • the time of the day and how regularly the openings are opened
  • the size and condition of the outdoor area, including any shaded areas, the presence of food, water and different vegetation and ground conditions
  • the stocking density of any outdoor area and
  • whether the hens have been trained or conditioned to remain indoors.

The ACCC instituted proceedings against free-range egg producers in December 2013.

Further Reading

Go to our previous news item on this story by clicking here.

© 2000 - 2024 - Global Ag Media. All Rights Reserved | No part of this site may be reproduced without permission.